Alexanders divinity Essay -- essays research papers

What proof is in that location that horse parsley may have believed that he was of divine railway line? And how convincing would this evidence have appeared to one of his followers?From studying the sources of the superannuated world that talk about Alexander The Great, it is clear that many of them map Alexander as being few type of heroic depend or Demi-god. However you could skepticism whether Alexander believed this himself. Only by studying his actions and the actions of those around him can we draw any type of conclusion on this matter. This can be done through the use of sources that exist from the quantify of and around his death. Most of these sources have been lost or are rudimentary however, so I feel that it would be best to mainly meditate the sources of Arrian and Plutarch Although both of these were written a couple of hundred years afterward Alexanders death they are palliate the most complete. add-on Arrian would seem to have many sources to shoot the breeze in his writing, all from Alexanders time. His main two sources were Ptolemy and Aristobulus, both of whom were on Alexanders campaigns. Plutarchs account is more a biography than a chronicle since it is full of stories and anecdotes, however it contains some information that Arrian doesnt so it is still a worthy source to consult. In this it would first be responsible to study all those events in Alexanders life, which would seem to show that he did have some belief that he was of divine origin. The immemorial example of this would appear to be his visit to the shrine of Ammon. While in Egypt, Alexander had an urge to visit the temple since he wanted to consult the oracle there, which had a reputation for infallibility. Arrian alike states that both Perseus and Heracles had consulted it at some point. And since it is clear from Arrians account that Alexander longed to duplicate, if not surpass, the feats of both Perseus and Heracles, so surely he must consult this oracl e in addition. Arrian (book 3) claims that the blood of both flowed within Alexander, which suggests that Arrian was of the opinion that Alexander did have some divine inheritance since Heracles was supposedly the son of Zeus. In any case, Arrian also states that Alexander also visited the temple because he himself felt that he might be descended from Ammon in some way. If this is true then it would certainly seem that Alexander did in some way believe that he was of d... ... countries that he defeated. Alexander, being the spacious tactician that he was must have realised the benefits of people believing that he was more than just a great ruler and actually connected to the gods themselves.As far as the beliefs of his followers go, I believe that the willingness of the Persians to lie themselves in front of him and his Macedonian troops loyalty were important indicators. This is seen when they followed him crosswise the vast desert in which the temple of Ammon was situated, ju st to answer the question of whether or not he did descend from the Egyptian god this suggests that they too believed in his claim to being of divine descent. And it can be seen that there are not many men that were as revered and honoured by the people of the time as Alexander was. Leaving no distrust in my mind that both Alexander and his followers were convinced that he was of divine descent and that they felt that he was worthy of all the aid that was paid to him after he died.Word count 3298